The Manufactured Icons: How Empires, Agencies & Modern Media Created Over-Hyped Indian Personalities
An analysis of colonial, Western, and contemporary political narrative engineering in India
“Narratives don’t just shape history; they manufacture heroes.” ~ Adarsh Singh
India’s past and present have been shaped by two forces that most people never question:
1. Organic leaders, born out of the soil and struggles of the people.
2. Manufactured icons, amplified by British colonial machinery, later Western intelligence networks, and modern political-media PR ecosystems.
Some individuals who were certainly influential were nevertheless projected far beyond their organic public stature, first by the British, then by the CIA-era Western narrative-builders, and now by the hyperlinked political-media complex.
Let's examine how certain personalities became over-hyped or selectively constructed, not merely by public admiration, but by deliberate narrative engineering.
Colonial India’s Favorite Archetype: The “Anglicized Reformer”
Raja Ram Mohan Roy: A British-Endorsed Modernist
Raja Ram Mohan Roy’s fame did not spread through Indian civilizational circuits, it spread through British and missionary networks.
⚞ Missionaries hailed him as “the enlightened Indian.”
⚞ British liberals promoted him as the ideal native who embraced Western rationality.
⚞ He became the reference point for every English-speaking reformer that British India wanted to boost.
“Colonial powers never choose heroes randomly; they choose those who validate their worldview.” ~ Adarsh Singh
Roy was undoubtedly a reformer, but the scale of his glorification reveals the colonial need to create a Western-approved model of Indian modernity.
The Gandhi-Nehru Phase: Myth-Making on a Global Scale
{A} Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi: The British-Approved Saint
Few political leaders in world history have had their image shaped as carefully as Gandhi:
British newspapers portrayed him as the “holy man of peace”
⚞ His ideology conveniently discouraged violent resistance
⚞ His movements often rose dramatically, then abruptly withdrawn
They consistently demobilized the masses at critical turning points
Was it intentional or coincidental?
History may debate it, but pattern recognition is undeniable.
“Non-violence is a virtue only when the oppressor is moral. Against an empire, it becomes a tool of the oppressor.” ~ Adarsh Singh
{B} Jawaharlal Nehru: The West’s Preferred Voice of India
Nehru’s charismatic Western appeal made him a darling of global institutions:
⚞ Oxford-Cambridge grooming
⚞ Endorsements from British journalists
⚞ Admiration from American and European elites
⚞ International press coverage that far exceeded Indian grassroots sentiment
His worldview aligned with post-war Western liberalism, making him the perfect geopolitical spokesperson for the newly decolonized East.
Nehru was impactful, but the myth of Nehruvian supremacy was manufactured by:
⚞ Western academia
⚞ English-language media
⚞ Global diplomatic circles
This version of Nehru overshadowed other giants like Sardar Patel, Sri Aurobindo, Bose, Savarkar, etc.
Dr. B.R. Ambedkar: A Critical Thinker, Posthumously Weaponized
B.R. Ambedkar was a monumental intellectual. But the sudden Western explosion of “Ambedkar scholarship” post-2010 must be understood.
Western institutions selectively amplified:
⚞ His criticism of Hindu structures
⚞ His anti-Brahmin writings
⚞ His Western-influenced frameworks of social analysis
Why?
Because these narratives could be used to:
⚞ Fragment Hindu unity
⚞ Fuel identity-based politics
⚞ Influence India’s internal discourse
⚞ Control sociopolitical narratives through guilt-based interventions
“He was a scholar. They turned him into a weapon.” ~ Adarsh Singh
Ambedkar’s contributions deserve respect. But the selective magnification of specific writings shows Western narrative engineering at work.
Cold War Era & the CIA Influence: Shaping India’s “Moderate Elite”
Manmohan Singh: The West’s Ideal Economist
Dr. Manmohan Singh’s economic reforms shaped modern India. But the glorification of his image emerges from:
⚞ World Bank narratives
⚞ IMF projections
⚞ Western financial press calling him India’s savior
⚞ American think tanks celebrating him as a “reliable stabilizer”
He represented a technocratic, soft-spoken India, predictable, compliant, pro-liberalization, and harmonious with global capital.
“Global institutions don’t admire you for your strength; they admire you for your usefulness.” ~ Adarsh Singh
Manmohan Singh was competent, but the halo was engineered.
The 21st Century: The Age of Media-Made Messiahs
{A} Arvind Kejriwal: The First Full-Blown Media-Created Revolutionary
Kejriwal’s rise represents the most sophisticated modern political manufacture:
⚞ Western-funded NGOs
⚞ Hyper-aggressive primetime media
⚞ Calibrated PR
⚞ Foreign activism circuits
⚞ A carefully scripted anti-corruption identity
His public projection as an “incorruptible savior” was out of proportion to his actual administrative or ideological contributions.
“A lie repeated by a hundred cameras becomes a revolution.” ~ Adarsh Singh
Kejriwal is the template for post-2010 political creation.
{B} Prashant Kishore Pandey (PKP): The Manufactured Strategist
Prashant Kishore Pandey is perhaps the most fascinating modern myth:
⚞ Media calls him a political genius
⚞ His influence claims are unverified
⚞ He is treated like an oracle without clear evidence
⚞ Political parties follow him like a marketer of destiny
But the question remains:
Which major election did PKP personally win for any party? None convincingly.
His brand is a creation of:
⚞ Data-driven consultancy hype
⚞ Media amplification
⚞ PR machinery
⚞ Psychological packaging
⚞ Perception-based valuation
“He isn’t a strategist. He is a narrative, designed, branded, and sold.” ~ Adarsh Singh
Additional Personalities Fitting the “Manufactured” Pattern
Others who also benefited from disproportionate projection, such as:
V.P. Singh, the “messiah of social justice,” created largely by media hype
Sheikh Abdullah, projected as Kashmir’s unquestioned leader by Western diplomats
Medha Patkar, amplified by foreign-funded activism networks
Amartya Sen, celebrated disproportionately by Western academia for ideological convenience
“Heroes are born, but icons are engineered.” ~ Adarsh Singh
Not all were harmful or dishonest, but their public magnitude was not organic, it was shaped by powerful institutions.
Manufactured Icons vs. Organic Civilizational Giants
India’s genuine heroes arose from its cultural soil:
♚ Sri Aurobindo
♚ Subhas Chandra Bose
♛ Rani Lakshmibai
♚ Maharana Pratap
♚ Sardar Patel
♚ Veer Savarkar
♚ Guru Gobind Singh
♚ Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj
♚ Rabindranath Tagore
♥ Countless unnamed fighters
But manufactured icons, created by colonial or external forces, often overshadowed them.
“When shallow icons rise, real heroes disappear from textbooks.” ~ Adarsh Singh
Wed Nov 19, 2025
Launch your Graphy